Unluckiest model · all-time

Who's the unluckiest
NHL player ever?

Brad Park. I scored the 305 best finished NHL careers on nine kinds of bad luck, then ran the model 10,000 different ways. Park finished first in 79.5% of them and in the top 5 in 98.5%.

305 careersEvery season since 192610,000 model versionsAnswer: Brad Park
The final five#1 in 10,000 versions
1Brad ParkD · 1968–19850Cups won79.5%#1 in98%
2Dino CiccarelliR · 1980–19990Cups won5.6%#1 in46%
3Glenn ReschG · 1973–19871Cups won5.2%#1 in44%
4John VanbiesbrouckG · 1981–20020Cups won3.4%#1 in37%
5Ray BourqueD · 1979–20011Cups won0.0%#1 in36%

Big number = share of the 10,000 versions of the model where he finished in the top 5. “#1 in” = how often he finished first.

Watch the model get built, version by version.

The answer

The case for Brad Park

A Hall of Fame defenceman for the Rangers and the Bruins, from 1968 to 1985. He was in the room every spring and watched the door close.

Stanley Cups
0

In 17 seasons, and his team made the playoffs in every single one of them.

Cups expected
1.84

At his teams' real odds, he wins at least one Cup in 8,634 of 10,000 simulated careers. That's an 86% chance.

Seasons ended by the champion
9

His season was ended by the team that went on to win the Cup 9 times. The pool average is about 3.

Stanley Cup Finals lost
3

1972 vs Bruins, 1977 vs Canadiens, 1978 vs Canadiens.

Norris runner-ups
6

Four times behind Bobby Orr and twice behind Denis Potvin. He never won it.

Deciding games lost by one goal
4

Including the 1974 Game 7 against the Flyers and the 1979 too-many-men Game 7 in Montreal. His teams also lost 40 playoff goals to cold shooting and cold goaltending.

His Cup odds, every season

His best chance in any one season was only 20% (1971), about 1 in 5. But he got 17 tries.

69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
The 9 springs that ended against the champion

Highlighted = the champion was a dynasty (the 1970s Canadiens, the early-1980s Islanders).

1969Round 1lost to Canadiens
1970Round 1lost to Bruins
1972Finallost to Bruins
1974Round 2lost to Flyers
1977Finallost to Canadiens
1978Finallost to Canadiens
1979Round 3lost to Canadiens
1980Round 2lost to Islanders
1983Round 3lost to Islanders
Version by version

How Brad Park rose

Park's rank at each version of the model, out of 305. He took over at version 4 and never gave it back.

V1 · Great, no Cup
#11
Park's rank · leader: Roberto Luongo
V2 · Cups expected vs won
#3
Park's rank · leader: Roberto Luongo
V3 · Bodies
#2
Park's rank · leader: Cam Neely
V4 · The dynasty tax
#1
Park's rank · leader: Brad Park
V5 · Bounces
#1
Park's rank · leader: Brad Park
V6 · Circumstances
#1
Park's rank · leader: Brad Park
10,000 universes

Change every choice, same answer

I chose the weights, the prime window and the pool. So I ran 10,000 versions with random weights, different pools and different team ratings, and sometimes deleted a whole factor.

Delete any one factor

Park's #1 share when that factor is removed entirely. He wins 82.5% with all nine.

Greatness × luck

I also tried a version where bad luck counts more the greater the player was. Park still came first in 54.5% of universes, and the only player who got close was Ray Bourque at 21.9%. In the main model, Bourque is #2 on the full board and finished top 5 in 36.1% of universes.

Every career

All 305 players

The full model (version 6, equal weights). Score = the nine factors added up, each measured against the pool, so 0 is average. Tap a column to sort.

Bounce goals: playoff goals lost to cold shooting and cold goaltending against the team's own regular season (shot data starts in 1959-60; earlier seasons count as 0). The usual names rank lower: Roberto Luongo 15th · Joe Thornton 16th · Marcel Dionne 29th · Cam Neely 31st · Eric Lindros 34th · Bobby Orr 40th · Mario Lemieux 69th · Mike Bossy 295th.

Method

How the model works

Version 1 · Great, no Cup

The simplest definition of bad luck: you were great, and you never won the Cup. Career point shares count only if the Cup count is zero. Leader: Roberto Luongo.

Version 2 · Cups expected vs won

Every season, his team gets its fair share of that year's Cup based on how good it was in the regular season. Expected Cups minus Cups won. Leader: Roberto Luongo.

Version 3 · Bodies

How much of his prime, age 22 to 31, he actually got to play. The average player in the pool lost about 9%. Leader: Cam Neely.

Version 4 · The dynasty tax

Every season that ended against the eventual champion, with extra weight for dynasties and for losing in the Final. Leader: Brad Park.

Version 5 · Bounces

Series lost in the last possible game (double if by one goal), plus playoff goals lost because his team's shooters and goalies went cold. Leader: Brad Park.

Version 6 · Circumstances

Weak teammates, 2nd-place award finishes, and bad timing: a team that just got rid of him wins the Cup. Leader: Brad Park.

10,000 universes

Every version of the model with random weights, pools, prime windows and team ratings. Park finished first in 79.5% and in the top 5 in 98.5%.

The backtest

Can it tell who should have won?

A backtest means I hid one season at a time and asked the model to call it from the final standings, like an old exam with the answers covered up. I did that for all 99 seasons.

When it gave a team about a 12% chance, those teams won 11.7% of the time (12 of 103). It expected 97 of the 305 players to finish without a Cup, and the real number is 96.

The pool: Hockey-Reference's top 250 careers in point shares plus every Hall of Famer with 300+ NHL games, with at least half the career after 1926. Active players are left out, because an unfinished career can't be scored. Goalies are included.

The twist

Jean Ratelle kept showing up near the top too (10th on the full board), and he was traded to Boston in the same 1975 deal as Park. They lost the same 3 Finals and 8 of the same 9 exits to the champion. In that 1979 Game 7, Ratelle had 3 assists.

The newsletter

The numbers that didn't make the video

Extra charts, cut segments and tracker updates between videos. Free.

▶  Subscribe on YouTube